The Integration of Formative and Summative
Assessments
Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa,
Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan
Our belief that the
type of assessment we do determines the success of education makes assessment a
crucial component of our educational system. Our school uses a continuous
evaluation process all year long, doing both formative and summative
assessments. I believe that learning should be the main objective of any
examination, not just understanding the material. Because I always want my
students to improve their capacity and ability to use their knowledge and
skills in meaningful ways, I routinely provide exams. At my school, I evaluate
my students using a range of tools.
Considering whether to integrate
formative and summative assessments into the way I evaluate my students
As required by the
educational system in my nation, I combine formative and summative evaluations
when evaluating my students to gain a more complete picture of their learning
and development. Utilizing both types of exams to get a complete picture of a
student's learning and development is known as the integration of formative and
summative assessments. Giving students regular feedback that fosters learning
and contributes to an overall picture of their learning, can make the assessment
process more relevant for them (University of Bristol, n.d.). In my classroom,
I typically utilize formative assessment to track the development of my student's
knowledge and to continuously give feedback based on their needs to modify my
own training. On the other hand, I utilize summative tests to measure my
pupils' level of skill or knowledge at a certain point in time. The information
gained from the two tests is then combined to provide me a more complete
picture of each student in my class, including their strengths and limitations,
allowing me to make decisions about how to support their learning by raising
the standard of teaching and learning (Looney, 2011). It will give me feedback
on my instruction and enable me to modify my pedagogical approaches at the
moment, enhancing my students' understanding and enhancing their readiness for
summative exams. For instance, I have observed my students mastering the goals
and each strand of the numerous goals in the subject I teach while also gaining
a solid theoretical and conceptual grasp of the various contents (Singh, 2021).
I've seen significant
progress in my students by combining formative and summative exams in the
classroom. With more engagement, I've seen that my students are learning more.
Additionally, I will have a better understanding of my students as I can
identify their strong points and areas for improvement. This will allow me to
better plan for the summative exam and utilize classroom time for successful
lessons. As a result of what I learned in Units 1 and 2, I now have a greater
knowledge of the formative and summative assessment processes and how they work
together. I came to see that integrating formative and summative assessments
may give our students effective learning opportunities and produce successful
learning results.
Considering whether a school has a
concern for or aspires to this integration
Every school aspires
for its students to gain knowledge, skills, and personal growth and wants to
give them lifelong learning skills (Alfarsi, 2020) so that they can become
productive and contributing citizens. This is why the integration of formative
and summative assessments is generally seen as a goal in schools. The use of
both sorts of assessments gives educators a more complete picture of a
student's development and learning and aids in their decision-making about how
best to promote student learning. Summative evaluations measure a student's
knowledge of a subject or skill, whereas formative assessments offer ongoing
feedback to improve education. Teachers can more accurately analyze a student's
strengths and weaknesses by combining the data from the two types of exams.
They can then use this information to decide how best to support the student's
learning in the classroom and when to offer them the correct remedial services.
This integration is regarded as advantageous and is frequently desired in many
schools. Educators can better comprehend a student's learning process and
modify their teaching tactics in real time by merging the data from the two
types of evaluations (Looney, 2011). As a result, students learn more
effectively and are better prepared for summative exams. Additionally, as
students receive regular feedback on their progress and can see how their learning
is progressing, the integration of formative and summative exams can boost
student engagement and motivation (Formative and Summative Assessments, 2021).
Because it can result in a more thorough and efficient assessment process,
enhanced student learning, and higher levels of student engagement, the
integration of formative and summative assessments is thus a goal in schools.
My New Learning from This Unit
The takeaway
knowledge from this lesson is the integration of formative and summative
assessments through technology, even though I have been practicing assessment
through the integration of formative and summative assessment processes in my
school. I came to understand that using digital technologies to administer and
assess student learning is a useful method of assessment since it gives
teachers real-time information on student learning and enables them to modify
their instruction accordingly. Since the data would be gathered over time for a
variety of tasks and in different contexts, it provides more accurate
information on student performance on complex cognitive tasks, such as how
students approach problem-solving, open-ended performances, like written
essays, or student collaboration on constructed response formats (Looney,
2011). Additionally, technology can simplify the administration and scoring of
exams, enabling a more effective and impartial assessment of student
achievement.
References
Alfarsi, B. A. (2020). Integrating formative and
summative assessment in learning and evaluation of English language in post
basic education schools (secondary schools).
https://www.eimj.org/uplode/images/photo/Integrating_formative_and_summative_assessment_in_learning_and_evaluation_of_English_language.pdf
Formative and Summative Assessments.
(2021b, June 30). Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning.
https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/Formative-Summative-Assessments
Looney, J. (2011). Integrating formative and summative
assessments: progress towards a seamless system. OECD Education Working
Papers No. 58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529586.pdf
Singh, V. V. (2021). Appraising the Aim to
integrate Formative assessments with Summative assessments. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/appraising-aim-integrate-formative-assessments-summative-singh
University of Bristol. (n.d.). Rethinking
Assessment.
https://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/education/migrated/documents/integrating.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment