How Does My
Educational Philosophy Apply to My Practice or Beliefs of Teaching?
Author: Santosh Kumar
Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan
An educational Philosophy is purely the vision of
the teacher that serves the purpose of education in fulfilling the role he
plays in the classroom in preparation for anyone’s life through the passing of
varied contents and skills. It is the process that facilitates teaching and
learning through varied means in which the learners can acquire values about
life and skills for life to become complete human beings. It depends on how a
teacher reflects on his beliefs about the way he teaches and promotes learning.
In the learning process, students are engaged in acquiring new concepts and
relating them with their familiar concepts. In my understanding, the learning
process requires activities and creativity.
My educational philosophy is clear and is focused on
student-centered philosophies that provide students with hands-on practice to
acquire knowledge, values, and skills in all aspects. It basically focuses the
teaching method on learning by doing whereby the teacher’s role is just to
facilitate the learning processes in the classroom. They share the common
principle of achieving the complete development of a child whereby planning,
teaching, and assessment are carefully considered and revolve around based on
the abilities and needs of every learner (Brown, 2008).
After going through the various philosophies, I
realized that transformation should ultimately take place in the learners
during the course of their learning. I mostly believe that students learn
better if they are made to take part in the activities through peer or
cooperative learning. In my classroom, most of the time students are engaged in
learning by doing whereby they are involved in inquiry learning, research, and
finding the solutions and then share in the classroom through presentations for
comparing with the other’s findings and contrasting to make meaning out of
their own findings with reasoning. It is purely based on the philosophies that
I have learned from the course about student-centered philosophy. It basically
focuses the teaching method on learning by doing whereby the teacher’s role is
just to facilitate the learning processes in the classroom. They share the
common principle of achieving the complete development of a child whereby
planning, teaching, and assessment are carefully considered and revolve around
based on the abilities and needs of every learner (Brown, 2008). As stated, in
my classroom, I act as a facilitator to promote learning, and yes, it has
proven its worth at the national level too when compared with other schools in
the country.
According to my beliefs, I personally think that the
world is changing rapidly and digital technology is ruling over it, the purpose
of education should be based on the demands of the 21st century. It should be
something that must train students to be quick like the computer, resolute
characterized by firmness and determination, and creative and effective
thinkers who are more efficient so that they are able to achieve the legitimate
goals of their life (Luther, 1947). Therefore, Dewey's concepts of experiential
education, democracy, humanism, and pragmatism have influenced my teaching
strategies at present time. My classes are mostly interactive whereby I act as
a facilitator, facilitating the class during the learning process. I engage my
learners more in inquiry learning, cooperative learning, learning through
research, drawing conclusions, role play, project writing, portfolio
maintaining, reading logs, etc. focusing purely on the wholesome development of
a child. However, after going through the educational philosophies, I felt that
I needed to do more than what I had been doing with clear objectives in mind.
Now, I realize that the ultimate aim of education should not be simply about
teaching the content for academic excellence in the classroom, but the creation
of complete human beings through continued education for capacity building and
mindful growth (Dewey, 1916/1980). My teaching is aligned with the perception
of Dewey as the sole purpose of education should prepare any individuals for
immediate life through self-realization through the practical life of the
learners is related to education (Shawal, n.d.). Moreover, his emphasis on
equipping learners with critical thinking skills that are integrated as a
constituent of the questioning, excelling mental habits, and eradicating false
beliefs and illusory ideas bequeathed by society so that each learner can
harness their natural ability (Popova, n.d.). Mostly, I allow my students
to think independently in the class to come up with the concept and then
collaborate with others in the class to come up with the concrete concept. It
is evident that what I have been doing in my classroom so far is all based on
the student-centered philosophies that include Progressivism, Existentialism,
and Social Reconstructionism which are very essential for any kind of
educational process for achieving the intended educational goals.
More than anything, after going through the
educational philosophies, I genuinely realized and feel that learning by doing
should not be based on acquiring only the content knowledge but should promote
positive changes in the learners. Moreover, I realized that I should make my
students better problem solvers in life than academic achievers. I should not be
content-oriented, but I should be focused more on creating their learning
outcomes based on their focus on reality and the present situation creating
them to be more judgmental to easily identify right and wrong or good and bad
(Sadker and Zittleman, 2007). Passing the exam should be my primary objective
whenever I go to the class but it should be something more than that, students
should be prepared as tools to overcome some of the social problems and prepare
them to be productive leaders and citizens of the country. Now I realize that
each student should be well educated about life, not simply to achieve good
marks in their academics, but also to be a good human being so that they value
cultural differences, religious differences, poverty, respect for others, etc.
(Lynch, 2016).
To conclude, I take the stand to subscribe to
all the educational philosophies because they are equally important to make our
students the complete ones. We are paid by the government to not simply go to
the class and explain the text but to do something extraordinary for a better
outcome. Progressivism is important because it gives students hands-on
experience to work independently in the future. Moreover, skills and knowledge
are important aspects of life and it is through essentialism that students get to
identify themselves better which is very important. On the other hand, simply
having knowledge and understanding about oneself is not enough in anyone's
life, one needs to understand the system in the society, the problems in
society, and acting wisely is pivotal in life. Therefore, social
reconstructionism is also a very important aspect because moral values are what
matters for a better society to mend. Finally, in Bhutan, a small country
situated between two giants India and China, nationalism in education is very
important. We need to preserve our culture, customs, traditions, and identity
to exist independently forever. Therefore, students should be aware of all
those things. And it can happen only through the teaching philosophies that we
adopt wisely. I also should not forget that I am preparing my students to face
the challenges that they are going to face soon and it is only through having
clear philosophies in our mind we can make the differences in the class that we
go extraordinarily. For this, I should also be determined, dedicated, and
hardworking.
Reference
King, M. L., Jr . (1947.). The
purpose of education. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from
http://okra.stanford.edu/transcription/document_images/Vol01Scans/123_Jan-Feb1947_The%20Purpose%20of%20Education.pdf
Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy
and education: An introduction to philosophy of education. In J. A. Boydston
(Ed.), The
middle works: 1899–1924, volume 9, 1916 (pp. 1–370).
Carbondale/Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Shawal. M. (n.d.). 4 Main Aims of Education as Advocated by John Dewey. Retrieved June, 19,
2021, https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/education/4-main-aims-of-education-as-advocated-by-john-dewey/69151
Popova. M. (n.d.). John Dewey on the True Purpose of Education
and How to Harness the Power of Our Natural Curiosity. Retrieved June,
19, 2021, https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/09/19/john-dewey-purpose-of-education/
Sadker, D. &
Zittleman K. (2007). Teachers School and Society: A Brief Introduction to
Education. 207-217. Retrieved Retrieved July 8, 2021 from http://education.com/reference/article/Ref_Teacher_Centered
Lynch. M.
(2016). Philosophies of Education: 3
Types of Student-Centered Philosophies. Retrieved July 3,
2021
https://www.theedadvocate.org/philosophies-education-3-types-student-centered-philosophies/
No comments:
Post a Comment