How do I infer Jacobs' (2010) claim that ‘To move our school structures into more open, fluid, and correspondingly inventive forms, we need new forms, not reform’ in the context of classrooms of the future?
Author: Santosh Kumar
Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan
In “Curriculum 21: Essential Education for a Changing World”
by Jacobs (2010), he shows his concerns about our existing education system and
presents how our schools should transform so that the educational processes
match the current 21st-century needs of the learners. He stated, “To move our
school structures into more open, fluid, and correspondingly inventive forms,
we need new forms, not reform” and he is correct when he said that because the
world is reshaping rapidly and the education process needs to be shaped in the
new forms, not the reformation at this juncture.
I genuinely believe that curriculum for the classrooms of the
future needs to take its new forms through up-gradation since the way of life
is vastly changing rather than simply sticking to the same old model of
curriculum template that was created a long time back through just reforming.
He had observed a huge paradigm shift in the educational process from the
teacher-centered to the child-centered education and any such paradigm shift
should follow replacement in its forms both by structure and methodologies
(Nguyen, 2019). Currently, we see that the same building structures, lesson
scheduling, teaching processes, and grouping of students during activities have
been used for decades. Jacobs felt that they needed to be replaced and stated,
"As educators, our challenge is to match the needs of our learners to a
world that is changing with great rapidity. To meet this challenge, we must
become strategic learners ourselves by deliberately expanding our perspectives
and updating our approaches" (Jacobs, 2010). Through his words, we can
sense that the curriculum needs to be updated through proper curriculum
mapping, streamlining the assessment models, aligning and updating the content,
and including socio-technology trends (Spark Adobe, n.d.).
I feel that the present practices are to be replaced so that we
can modernize the way we work, not simply by reviewing the curriculum and
substituting technology so that we can say we have used technology (Dyson,
n.d.). The question is, “How can we change the way we teach in the classroom to
prepare 21st-century learners?” (Slideshare, 2012). The changes are necessary
for our 21st-century learners because our learners are not new, not the
learners that we had before. Our curriculum should focus on meeting all the
aspects of life that our learners are going to face shortly.
To promote “open, fluid, and correspondingly inventive forms” of
the school, the learners should be engaged through inquiry learning,
risk-taking, creative demonstration during the learning, social engagement,
problem-solving, and self-directed learning. To fulfill this, Jacob (2010)
suggested the four key program structures that will shift not just the
curriculum but even the structures to effectively promote 21st-century
curriculum. They are the schedule, classroom grouping pattern, personal
configuration, and space configurations.
The Schedule
To make the learning objectives constructive and responsive,
Jacobs (2010, p.19) stressed short and long-term time scheduling by stating
“Educators should envision the learning outcomes first after which they should
match and align them as per the time configurations available within the limits
of the school”
Classroom Grouping Pattern
The question of how learners are grouped also matters for the
successful implementation process of the curriculum in the classroom. Jacobs
(2010) stressed grouping the students in the classroom based on the learning
objectives considering the learner’s age group, grades, and other things that
are necessary to consider at the time of grouping. By doing so, it fulfills the
specific objectives set for the specific groups of students.
Personal Configurations
Jacobs also shows her concern about educators’ configurations
because all come from multiple knowledge, affiliations, and experiences, and configuring
them through grouping them so that they can collaborate and contribute ideas to
solve problems in the classroom and the curriculum itself.
Space Configurations
Jacobs also shares her concern about how the physical space and
the virtual spaces are used. The educators should be aware of utilizing both
spaces properly, separately, or through combining them and should understand
that virtual space should be prioritized for extended learning purposes.
Learners should be prepared to use the technology to learn independently
because the scenario of the future classrooms would be more virtual and
physical.
The principles discussed above would meet the 21st-century
demands of education because the future of education is visible due to the
gaining popularity of social media and technology. The education system should demand
that every learner is prepared well for their future. I believe that the
suggested ideas would provide students with a high-quality education to its
learners.
Reference
Dyson, C. (n.d.). Curriculum
21. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from
https://dysonbigideas.weebly.com/summary.html
Jacobs, H.H. (2010). New school
versions: reinventing and reuniting school program structures. In Curriculum 21: essential education for a
changing world. ASCD. Download PDF version.
Nguyen, T. L. (2019). Classrooms of the Future. Retrieved
January 2, 2021 from https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/classrooms-of-the-future-5e68129c5188
Slideshare.net. (2012). A Summary of Curriculum 21: Essential
Education for a Changing World. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from
Spark Adobe. (n.d.). Curriculum 21: essential education for a
changing world. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from
https://spark.adobe.com/page/ejdWZSiy412K6/
No comments:
Post a Comment