Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan
Introduction
The most noteworthy theorists in the area of human development are Freud,
Erikson, Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bronfenbrenner (Johnson, 2021). These five
thinkers have made a significant impact in the field of human development. The
emphasis on the unconscious mind and early experiences that Freud placed on the
study of behaviour has influenced how psychologists today approach the subject.
Erikson's theory of psychosocial development places a strong emphasis on the
role that culture and society play in determining how an individual develops.
Researchers have gained insight into how kids create their worldviews because
of Piaget's cognitive development hypothesis. The sociocultural theory of
Vygotsky has underlined the importance of culture and social interactions in
learning and development. Finally, the intricate interactions between diverse
systems that affect human development have been highlighted by Bronfenbrenner's
ecological systems theory. These philosophers' combined efforts have expanded our
knowledge of how people develop and evolve over a while.
How each theorist views development
I realized from his psychoanalytic theory that Sigmund Freud emphasized the
relevance of unconscious processes in influencing human behaviour and
personality. He believed that growth was primarily impacted by unconscious
processes and early experiences, particularly regarding the psychosexual stages
of development (McLeod, 2008). I realized that people must address unconscious
conflicts resulting from formative experiences to successfully develop and that
doing so can avert psychiatric issues. It became apparent that growth happens
in stages, each of which is marked by a distinct focus on a different physical
area. For instance, during the oral stage (from birth to 18 months), toddlers
concentrate mostly on their mouths, whereas at the phallic stage (from 3 to 6
years old), children begin to become aware of their genitalia. Freud's theory
also put forth the idea that the id, ego, and superego are aspects of the
psyche that interact to influence behaviour.
The psychosocial theory developed by Erik Erikson posits that individuals go
through eight stages of growth, each characterized by a unique psychosocial
crisis. Erikson's theory emphasizes the influence of culture and society on
development and identifies several stages of psychosocial development that
involve issues related to identity and interpersonal relationships (Erikson,
1970). It is essential for individuals to successfully navigate these crises to
progress through the stages and establish a sense of self-identity. During
adolescence, for example, individuals must establish a strong sense of self and
determine their place within the larger social framework as they move through
the identity versus role confusion stage.
I discovered that Jean Piaget placed a lot of emphasis on how children learn
and comprehend the outside world in his cognitive developmental theory.
According to him, growth is a process of actively building knowledge that is
motivated by experiences with the environment. He hypothesized a progression of
cognitive phases that build upon one another and entail progressively more
complicated mental operations (Kuhn, 2008). I came to understand that kids
actively create their knowledge of the world through encounters with it.
According to Piaget's theory, development happens in four phases, each
characterized by ever more sophisticated cognitive capacities. For instance,
people who have reached the formal operational stage (adolescence and beyond)
can reason rationally and abstractly.
I observed that Lev Vygotsky's sociocultural theory postulated that cultural
background and social interaction influence cognitive development. He
maintained that learning is largely a social process and that people develop in
response to the cultural setting in which they live, and he underlined the
significance of social interactions and cultural context in influencing
development. Because learning occurs through a process of scaffolding, in which
more knowledgeable people provide just enough support to help learners master
new skills (Vygotsky, 1978), I realized that children learn through
interactions with more experienced peers and adults who can offer guidance and
support.
I found that Urie Bronfenbrenner emphasizes the significance of context in
influencing development in his ecological systems theory. He stressed the
intricate interplay between multiple systems, including individual,
microsystem, mesosystem, exosystemic, and macrosystem elements, that affect
development. According to Bronfenbrenner, a variety of contextual influences,
such as immediate family, community, and broader cultural values and beliefs,
have an impact on a person's development (Rosa & Tudge, 2013). According to
Bronfenbrenner's theory, a complex system of nested contexts, spanning from the
immediate environment (microsystem) to more general social, cultural, and
historical influences (macrosystem), governs how development occurs. I came to
see that people are influenced by both their immediate surroundings and more
general social and cultural forces.
How will I use this information to guide your work with adolescents?
It is crucial to take into account each theorist's point of view and to use
their insights to guide our practice to use this information to direct work
with teenagers (Smith, 2022). For instance, Freud's emphasis on unconscious
processes would imply that we need to pay attention to teenagers' emotional and
psychological needs as they move through various developmental phases.
Erikson's emphasis on identity formation should guide our efforts to help
teenagers establish a distinct sense of self and a satisfying sense of
identity. I understood that to design developmentally appropriate learning
experiences that test and promote adolescents' cognitive development, one
should be guided by Piaget's cognitive developmental theory. The sociocultural
theory of Vygotsky could guide our efforts to foster group learning and
acknowledge the significance of cultural context in influencing adolescent
development. Finally, Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory may aid us in
our efforts to comprehend the various contexts in which teenagers function and
to build situations that are supportive of their success.
Conclusion
In conclusion, these theorists have made important contributions to our
understanding of human development and the diverse biological, social, and
cultural aspects that affect it. Research and application in the area of human
development are still influenced by their theories.
References
Johnson, L. (2021). The impact of key theorists on the
field of human development. Journal of Human Development and Psychology, 18(2),
22-37.
Kuhn, D. (2008). Formal operations from a twenty-first
century perspective. Human Development, 51(1), 48-55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26763967
McLeod, S. (2008). Psychosexual stages. Simply
Psychology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/simplypsychology.org-Psychosexual-Stages.pdf
Rosa, E.M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie
Bronfenbrenner's theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to
bioecology. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 5, 243-258. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Urie-Bronfenbrenner%27s-Theory-of-Human-Development%3A-Rosa-Tudge/5ad78d042a25ab1c40f7ad12f034e7f019951c62
Smith, J. (2022). Applying developmental theories to
work with adolescents. Journal of Youth Development, 17(3), 45-58.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The interaction between learning
and development. In Vygotsky, L, Mind in Society. Harvard University
Press. http://ouleft.org/wp-content/uploads/Vygotsky-Mind-in-Society.pdf Or You
can refer Reading 4 - The interaction between learning and development.
No comments:
Post a Comment