Tuesday, August 6, 2024

Educational Philosophies on Educational Goals, Teaching Methods, and Curricula and My Reflection

 

Educational Philosophies on Educational Goals, Teaching Methods, and Curricula and My Reflection

Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan

 

Abstract

A teacher plays a vital role inside the classroom in imparting knowledge through the various educational pedagogical aspects and philosophies he applies that ultimately impact the outcome of learners. The impacts on learners depend on the beliefs, values, and understanding that every individual teacher possesses based on how he teaches and deals with the topic to make some differences in support of their values and beliefs (The Digi Teachers, n.d.). They are all dependent on the type of educational philosophies that a teacher carries in his mind. Education philosophies are integral in every aspect as they enable an individual to identify and interpret the syllabus its failure and the way forward to construct for the development process of the learners.

Educational Philosophies on Educational Goals, Teaching Methods, and Curricula

Educational philosophies depend on the four major schools of thought based on the theories put forward by Plato, Aristotle, 19th-century American philosophers, and Jean-Paul Sartre. They are Idealism, Realism, Pragmatism, and Existentialism respectively (The Digi Teachers, n.d.).

Idealism focuses on the subject matters whereby it allows students to discover their abilities and develop moral superiority through lecture and discussion so that they gain in-depth ideas, concepts, and knowledge. They based their learning purely on reasoning and questioning. (Narejo, 2015).

Realism focuses on experimentation and observation through investigation and research for character development of the learners to discover the knowledge whereby the teacher will be engaged in organizing and presenting the contentment and students are critically engaged in observing and experimenting with the help of objective criteria (Narejo, 2015).

Pragmatism follows a problem-solving curriculum whereby they focus on the application of learner's experiences to solve problems with the idea of change since reality is changing now and then. Mostly, students are engaged with problem-solving assignments or projects through experimental inquiry, especially in groups to exchange their ideas or collaborate their ideas for better learning outcomes (Narejo, 2015).

Existentialism focuses the learners to create their conclusion based on their focus on the present situation of the world and its reality. It is the learned-centered philosophy whereby the teacher's role is just to facilitate the learning process and they give freedom to the learners to draw their conclusions through the questioning and answering process (Narejo, 2015).

The above educational philosophies can be broken down into three categories of teaching philosophies such as teacher-centered philosophies, child-centered philosophies, and society-centered philosophies. They are directly dependent on the concepts based on the combination of two or more schools of thought (The Digi Teachers, n.d.). From many, some of the most important teaching philosophies of education are:

Progressivism: It is the philosophy in which the whole child is considered as the center of the focal point, not the content or the teacher. The students are engaged in the scientific methods of questioning to test ideas through their active participation and experimentation. They are assessed through their writing portfolio or projects. The students act as problem solvers in which they come up with their solutions through their own experiences and research (Presbitero, n.d.). Teachers are just the facilitators to check their progress and encourage learning by making positive changes. Books are just used as a medium to discover and learn new things. The curricula are based on the needs, interests, and abilities of the students (The Digi Teachers, n.d.).

Essentialism: It is the philosophy in which students are engaged in identifying themselves based on their characters through basic skills in life teacher-centered philosophies. In fact, students are more into identifying and directing themselves on what they should be learning and teachers lay out their choice through a systematic and disciplined manner. Its curriculum basically focuses on skills and knowledge building through proper discipline and hard work that prepare them to be productive members of society (Presbitero, n.d.). On the other hand, the teacher will be engaged in molding students by making them define themselves and refining them to be the complete person and are capable of identifying good and bad about life for self-awareness. They are open to creativity and are given the freedom of expression (Presbitero, n.d.). According to Matthew Lynch, he stated, "Essentialist educators focus on transmitting a series of progressively difficult topics and promotion of students to the next level or grade. Subjects are focused on the historical context of the material world and culture, and move sequentially to give a solid understanding of the present-day" (Lynch, 2016).

Social reconstructionism: It is the philosophy in which students are used as tools to overcome some of the social problems. Since school prepares the future leaders and citizens of the country, each student should be well educated about life, not simply to achieve good marks in their academics, but also to be a good human being so that they value cultural differences, religious differences, poverty, respect for others, etc. (Lynch, 2016). Such a classroom prepares students with good moral values through the lessons and makes students understand the values of life through discussions on the subject and analysis. Moreover, students are also engaged in improving in public speaking, leadership, building core skills, etc.

Nationalism: It is the philosophy in which students are prepared to showcase their love and respect for their country and its customs and traditions. Although there is no change in the curriculum, teachers will be engaged in imparting national values and biased information about the country so that they develop a sense of respect, love, and patriotism towards their country (The Digi Teachers, n.d.).

My Reflection on Beliefs and Practices on Educational Philosophies and the Philosophies I Would Subscribe To

As a teacher, I believe that I am a responsible person who plays an integral role in shaping the future of my nation, and my students, by making them capable and independent students. For this, I should be a role model with an outstanding teaching philosophy in front of them so that I can inspire them through the correct measures. It is because having an outstanding teaching philosophy means having a clear map to go ahead while teaching. We are responsible for the future of every student we teach because we are the future creators of the nation and we help them choose the correct profession and help them make perfect identities (edsys, 2018). It is the teacher who builds them to be independent thinkers and decision-makers in the future. I believe that we play the key role in providing them with the right values and lessons so that they stand in their shoes on their own by being judgmental. Having desired teaching philosophies means practicing better teaching strategies, knowledge about the purpose of education, and dedication while teaching. I think I am not too far away from the educational philosophies and teaching philosophies. At times, I might have deviated and might have compromised with the philosophies due to academic pressure, time factors, and peer influences, but now, I realize that our main focus on the learners is to be prioritized and should not be compromised with any other factors.

At present, my class is mostly interactive whereby I act as a facilitator, facilitating the class during the learning process. I engage my learners more in inquiry learning, cooperative learning, learning through research, drawing conclusions, role play, project writing, portfolio maintaining, reading logs, etc. focusing purely on the wholesome development of a child. However, after going through the educational philosophies, I felt that I needed to do more than what I had been doing with the clear objectives in mind.

Nevertheless, I would like to subscribe to all the philosophies stated above because they are equally important to make our students complete one. Progressivism is important because it gives students hands-on experience to work independently in the future. Moreover, skills and knowledge are important aspects of life and it is through essentialism that students get to identify themselves better which is very important. On the other hand, simply having knowledge and understanding about oneself is not enough in anyone's life, one needs to understand the system the society, and the problems in society, and acting wisely is pivotal in life. Therefore, social reconstructionism is also a very important aspect because moral values are what matters for a better society to mend. Finally, in Bhutan, a small country situated between two giants India and China, nationalism in education is very important. We need to preserve our culture, customs, traditions, and identity to exist independently forever. Therefore, students should be aware of all those things. And it can happen only through the teaching philosophies that we adopt wisely. I also should not forget that I am preparing my students to face the challenges that they are going to face soon and it is only through having clear philosophies in our mind we can make the differences in the class that we go extraordinarily. For this, I should also be determined, dedicated, and hardworking.

 

Reference:

The Digi Teachers. (n.d.). Understanding the Different Types of Teaching Philosophies. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://thedigiteachers.com/teaching-philosophies/

Narejo. I. (2015). Philosophical School of Thought. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://www.slideshare.net/irshadirshad75457/philosophical-school-of-thought

Presbitero, J. ( n.d.). Educational Philosophies Definitions and Comparison Chart. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://www.academia.edu/6866854/Educational_Philosophies _Definitions_and_Comparison_Chart

Lynch. M. (2016). Philosophies of Education: 3 Types of Student-Centered Philosophies. Retrieved July 3, 2021 https://www.theedadvocate.org/philosophies-education-3-types-student-centered-philosophies/

Edsys. (2018). Why Is It Important For Teachers to Study Philosophy of Education. Retrieved July 3, 2021 https://www.edsys.in/why-is-it-important-for-teachers-to-study-philosophy-of-education/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Dewey – Purposes and Principles of Education

 

John Dewey – Purposes and Principles of Education

Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan

 

Rationale

The impact that John Dewey brought to Americans through the revolution in the education system is still echoed in the present world. He is believed to be the most influential pragmatist, educationist, and philosopher who led the foundation of a progressive movement in education across the United States by discarding religiously motivated education, disciplinary education, and informational education and brought out the concept of the rapid social and economic changes in the world of education (Shawal, n.d.). It is thought that John Dewey’s influential philosophy that extended became one of the most important guiding forces throughout the twentieth century whose inclinations towards the concept of socialization and secularism are significant in his work (Piedra, 2018). Thus, with the change in time, the purpose of education has evolved in response to societal needs and to the situation and requirements of the situation. (Salon, 2012). Today, Dewey's concepts of experiential education, democracy, humanism, and pragmatism have altered the shape of the modern education system. This write-up will discuss Dewey’s purposes of teaching, his principles and influences on education, and its relationships with today’s IB education.

Dewey’s consideration about the purpose of education:

In the words of Dewey, the ultimate aim of education is not simply about teaching the content for academic excellence in the classroom, but the creation of complete human beings through continued education for capacity building and mindful growth (Dewey, 1916/1980). Theobald stated in 2009 that Dewey is one of the best-known people and a great educational influence on education (Williams, 2017). Dewey thinks that the sole purpose of education should prepare individuals for immediate life through self-realization through the practical life of the learners are related to education (Shawal, n.d.). Moreover, his emphasis on equipping learners with critical thinking skills that are integrated as a constituent of the questioning, excelling mental habits, and eradicating false beliefs and illusory ideas bequeathed by society so that each learner can harness their natural ability (Popova, n.d.).

According to Dewey, education is one of the mediums that bridges the nature of the learner with the social needs, and education should enable them to be socially efficient and culturally sound to address the social tenor of society (Shawal, n.d.) because a person develops himself staying in a society and social skills is integral to a healthy social life and a child should be able to respect his skills and his culture. According to Avi I. Mintz, he stated, “If social efficiency progressives emphasized the utility of the individual for the good of the state, advocates of “culture” emphasized the development of individual personality (Mintz, n.d.). In line with the culture, individual personality plays a crucial role in developing one’s culture that ultimately contributes to the nation as a whole. Dewey pointed out that the very purpose of education is to create a realization of one’s ability to identify the pre-determined skills in hand (Talebi, 2015), and he took a stand by saying that democracy and social reform should be the by-product of education as it leads to the Upliftment of the democratic society in which all people will be treated with equality and can assist one another efficiently.

Principles of Dewey’s philosophy and their influence on education:

The truth about life is that we must experience the reality. From the educational point of view of Dewey, students are to interact with their to adapt and learn during the process (Jordan, n.d.). In line with the statement above, some of the principles of Dewey’s philosophy and their influence on education are as follows:

 

Education is a process of reconstruction of experiences

Dewey defines education as the reconstruction or reorganization of experience we gain from any sources that add meaning to the experience and ultimately boost our ability to direct the subsequent experience (Cam, 2020). Dewey tries to convey us to that education involves continuous growth by stating Education is a process of reconstruction of experiences because it tells us about how much we reconstructed ourselves through the means of education both through experience and capacity.

Education is not preparation for life; education is itself life

The concept of life with education is distinctly based on the concept put forward by Dewey. He stated that education is not the stepping stone for the preparation of life, but education itself is a life. To him, the aim of education should be to train learners in cooperative living to exist in the society meaningfully and it should enable every individual for the reconstruction of experience already gained for the promotion of socialized values (Shawal, n.d.).

Education is the process of growth

Dewey puts forward this concept of ‘Education is the process of growth’ with the idea of having an end in the education process, whereby he pointed out that instead of being an end of anything, having an end is essential because education never ends (Callan, 1983), and it is the continuous process. The term ‘growth’ refers to the continuity of intellectual growth from immaturity to adulthood, the desirable trait and growth are the cumulative process that an individual develops holistically in due course of time (Desforges, 2018).

Education is a process that has two sides, one individual and the other one sociological

According to Dewey’s concept, the educational process in life consists of two sides, one individual’s psychology and on the other hand sociological impacts. This process is interdependent, neither can they be subordinated nor neglected as an individual’s psychology provides him with the foundation of the learning process, whereas the other provides the scenario of the concepts, but should be backed by wise guidance from the school. Dewey stated that a student won’t be able to achieve their intended successful future until they are well aware of their future and for this to happen, they are to be provided with hands-on learning so that they excel in their capacity externally (Wikipedia, 2020). On the other hand, they are to be allowed to utilize their skills through the utilization of their psychological process.

How Dewey’s Principles align with the principles of an IB education:

Dewey’s theories influence many countries, and their principles align with the principles of the International Baccalaureate (IB) Education’s principle in many ways towards education. For instance, If we look at the mission statement of IB Education, “The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect” (IBO, n.d.), it is evident that we can see Dewey’s principles in IB education system to produce inquiring and knowledgeable students through infusing curiosity skills in the area of inquiry learning and research. It is observed that the concept of humanity and a peaceful world is seen through the IB Learner profile Dewey’s influences are observed with the concept of the importance of being socially responsible and aware of his surroundings (IBO, n.d.). Similarly, John Dewey pointed out while arguing about the principle of culture, IB Education too wants their students to appreciate their history and culture by being open-minded. One of the common ideas of Dewey’s principles, “Humans are inherently good,” can be cropped with I.B. principles as well (JamesED, 2020). Thus, IB Education is widely aligned with Dewey’s principles and theories.   

 

Reference

Study.com. (2014). John Dewey on Education: Impact & Theory. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://study.com/academy/lesson/john-dewey-on-education-impact-theory.html.

Sloan, W. M. (2012). What Is the Purpose of Education? Retrieved June 19, 2021, http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/education-update/jul12/vol54/num07/What-Is-the-Purpose-of-Education%C2%A2.aspx

Piedra. A. M. (2018). The Tragedy of American Education- The role of John Dewey. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://www.iwp.edu/articles/2018/02/01/the-tragedy-of-american-education-the-role-of-john-dewey/

Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education: An introduction to philosophy of education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works: 1899–1924, volume 9, 1916 (pp. 1–370). Carbondale/Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Williams. M. K. (2017). John Dewey in the 21st Century. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1158258

Shawal. M. (n.d.). John Dewey’s View on Education. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/education/john-deweys-view-on-education/69149

Shawal. M. (n.d.). 4 Main Aims of Education as Advocated by John Dewey. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/education/4-main-aims-of-education-as-advocated-by-john-dewey/69151

Popova. M. (n.d.). John Dewey on the True Purpose of Education and How to Harness the Power of Our Natural Curiosity. Retrieved June 19, 2021,  https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/09/19/john-dewey-purpose-of-education/

Avi I Mintz. A. I. (n.d.). What is the Purpose of Education? Dewey's challenge to his contemporaries. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://www.academia.edu/23693775/What_is_the_Purpose _of_Education_Deweys_challenge_to_his_contemporaries

Wikipedia. (2020). My Pedagogic Creed. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Pedagogic_Creed

Callan. E. (1983). Dewey’s conception of Education as Growth, The board of trustees of the university, Illinois. Desforges, R. (2018). What did John Dewey really mean by “growth”? Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://medium.com/@roxannedesforges/what-did-john-dewey-really-mean-by-growth-df3e975198d2

John Dewey on Education: Impact & Theory. (2014). Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://study.com/academy/lesson/john-dewey-on-education-impact-theory.html.

 IBO. (n.d). About the IB. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://www.ibo.org/about-the-ib/

IBO. (2013). The IB learner profile. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://www.ibo.org/contentassets/fd82f70643ef4086b7d3f292cc214962/learner-profile-en.pdf

JamesEd. (2020). Dewey’s Connections to IB Education. Retrieved June 19, 2021, https://steamhead.space/deweys-connections-to-ib-education/

 

 

 

 

 

Paula’s Educational Philosophy That Appealed to Me

 

Paula’s Educational Philosophy That Appealed to Me

Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan

 

Abstract

The varied philosophies of education are the mark of educational reform that took place over time. Right from Dewey’s Essentialism and Perennialism of the teacher-centered philosophy, Progressivism, Humanism, and Constructivism of the student-centered philosophy, and Reconstructionism and Behaviorism of the socially centered philosophies to critical pedagogy concept of education philosophy by Paulo Freire, education had gained merits in the field of education reformation. On top of that, Freire’s Indigenous philosophy on education is another philosophy that strongly focuses on the student’s cultural backgrounds which are integral in the educational process. Whatever the philosophies, the impacts on learners depend on the beliefs, values, and understanding that every individual teacher possesses based on how he teaches and deals with the topic to make some differences in support of their values and beliefs (The Digi Teachers, n.d.). Moreover, teachers are responsible for the future of every student we teach because we are the future creators of the nation and we help them choose the correct profession and help them make perfect identities (edsys, 2018). The main focus on the learners is to be prioritized and should not be compromised with any other factors and ultimately it is the student-centered educational philosophy that makes all the difference in the long run because teacher-centered education never prepares student's lifelong learning.   

Paula’s Philosophy That Appealed to Me

Paula attempted to make various points about education not only about critical pedagogy but also about Indigenous philosophy on education as one must analyze the society where we grow and become an adult. We are shaped by society and Freire’s concept of critical consciousness during humanization plays a vital role in the social process of life.

 Education is considered to be the most prominent socializing force in any kind of society that we live in where knowledge of one’s culture, societal values, and life skills are passed to the preceding generation (Leik, 1992). Therefore, the philosophy of Paula that spoke to me and appealed to me is the Indigenous philosophy of education. I strongly feel that it is education that allows anyone to realize their cultural background for strong citizenship and identity to mend and secure the sovereignty of the nation.  A country with strong customs, traditions, and cultures can always remain an independent and sovereign nation. In the words of Raymond A. Morrow (2008), he stated, “One of the important principles of Freire’s pedagogy is to treat the learner with ample respect – no matter how illiterate or marginal they are.  It  implies  a  kind  of  personal  or  human  equality that does  not  require  formal  equality  of  knowledge” (Morrow, 2008), and yes, I truly believe that human quality counts a lot at present when this world is crowded with desirous people and  Freire  concludes  that  it  is  grounded  on  treating  the  “subjects” of transmission as “objects.”

 What surprised me a lot about Paula’s idea on education is the idea of ‘Culturally Relevant Pedagogy’ because the very idea has the specific ideology of helping children to make them accept their cultural identity positively along with the development of critical perspectives to enable them to tackle with any kinds of disparities or inequalities that they confront within a society which is organized around property rights so that they can analyze inequities (Billings, Gloria, Tale, and William,  1995). The very aspect of this philosophy is to enable students to learn to respect one’s cultural background. The influences of colonization and its impact in the past and the Western culture influence at present time can impact anyone to associate with their country’s norms, but the inclusion of Indigenous pedagogy will enable students to consider their culture and origin despite any form of influences.

I strongly prefer the ‘Culturally Relevant Pedagogy’ as it will keep people intact to reconnect themselves with their own culture despite influences from other sources. One can consider it as the educational philosophy of my country.  My country has high expectations from its citizens that there is the total human development of her children.  The formation of every child to be a man or woman of values, able to respect their country’s culture, custom and tradition themselves in proclaiming its sovereignty although sandwiched between two giant nations, through their profession to contribute good of the society they are in by being valuable and quality citizens (Simeon, 2018), and the influence of western traditions on educational philosophy is never been successful to find a stable basis upon which to rest its aims of education in the context of the country’s goals.

 The said philosophies can spark changes in educational practice or instructional models over time, especially in the context of the education system in my country because it would be able to reclaim and regenerate Indigenous languages, histories, and wisdom traditions safeguarding them from fading away as the process of Education will be basically concerned with the aims of providing literacy, identity, and numeracy (Stewart, 2017). Moreover, Indigenous education for me is the pathway to regenerate people whose language and culture are already stamped out due to some reasons within schooling. 

 

Conclusion

Thus, the recognition of specific educational philosophy is essential through the identification of educational activity to also meet the expectations at par with the country’s vision and mission. It should provide the directions for the intended endeavor. At the same time, one important aspect that any curriculum designer should keep in mind is the amount the indigenous philosophy to uplift education with a great sense of values towards the country’s culture.

 

 

                                                                        Reference

The Digi Teachers. (n.d.). Understanding the Different Types of Teaching Philosophies. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://thedigiteachers.com/teaching-philosophies/

Edsys. (2018). Why Is It Important For Teachers to Study Philosophy of Education. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://www.edsys.in/why-is-it-important-for-teachers-to-study-philosophy-of-education/

Leik, V. (1992). Bringing Indigenous Perspectives into Education: A Case Study of “Thunderbird/Whale Protection and Welcoming Pole: learning and teaching in an Indigenous World.” Retrieved July 13, 2021 from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.865.7355&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Morrow, R. A. (2008). Paulo Freire, Indigenous Knowledge and Eurocentric Critique of Development: Three Perspectives. Retrieved July 13, 2021 from https://brill.com/view/book/9789460911446/BP000007.xml

Billings, L, Gloria, Tale, and William, F. (1995). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education. Retrieved July 13, 2021 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ519126

Simeon, A. (2018). Indigenous Philosophies of Education and Christian Education. Retrieved July 13, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346650696_INDIGENOUS_PHILOSOPHIES_OF_EDUCATION_AND_CHRISTIAN_EDUCATION

Stewart, G. (2017). What does ‘indigenous’ mean, for me? Retrieved July 13, 2021 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2017.1302050

 

Educational Philosophies and the Analysis of My Chosen Educational Theory

  

Educational Philosophies and the Analysis of My Chosen Educational Theory

Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan

 

Abstract

John Dewey believes that any kind of education is followed by the involvement of an individual in the social consciousness of the race (Dewey, 1897). As such, education should allow every individual to share their knowledge and moral resources in which mankind has succeeded in getting along and make them the perfect social beings. Better education takes if better educational philosophies are placed in hand by the implementers. They should know its very purpose, the application process, and the way they interpret the educational theories and the learning philosophy. The rationale behind them should be clear in the mindset of the implementers because it will allow them to have greater opportunities to explore and improve by design (UCD. n.d.).

Analysis of my Chosen Educational Philosophy

Today, with the advent of science and human philosophy in the world, producing a learner as a good social being has become a challenge to educators to meet the very purposes of education. A teacher plays an integral role in imparting knowledge through the various educational pedagogical aspects and philosophies he applies that ultimately impact the outcome of learners.

Having gone through all the educational philosophies such as idealism, realism, pragmatism, and Existentialism, what resonates with my belief in educational philosophies is that all philosophies are equally compelling to meet the standard of the 21st century needs which center the educational theories such as teacher-centered philosophies, student-centered philosophies, and society-centered philosophies. They are directly dependent on the concepts based on the combination of two or more educational philosophies (The Digi Teachers, n.d.). Among them, I subscribe to student-centered philosophies because they include Progressivism, Existentialism, and Social Reconstructionism which are very essential for any kind of educational process for achieving intended educational goals. It basically focuses the teaching method on learning by doing whereby the teacher’s role is just to facilitate the learning processes in the classroom. They share the common principle of achieving the complete development of a child whereby planning, teaching, and assessment are carefully considered and revolve around based on the abilities and needs of every learner (Brown, 2008). A detailed elaboration about them is as below:

Progressivism

It is the philosophy in which the whole child is considered as the center of the focal point, not the content or the teacher. The students are engaged in the scientific methods of questioning to test ideas through their active participation and experimentation. They are assessed through their writing portfolio or projects. The students act as problem solvers in which they come up with their solutions through their own experiences and research (Presbitero, n.d.). Teachers are just the facilitators to check their progress and encourage learning by making positive changes. Books are just used as a medium to discover and learn new things. The curricula are based on the needs, interests, and abilities of the students (The Digi Teachers, n.d.).

Existentialism 

Existentialism is another type of student-centered philosophy that focuses the learners to create their outcomes based on their focus on reality and the present situation. They become more judgmental to easily identify right and wrong or good and bad (Sadker and Zittleman, 2007). It is the learned-centered philosophy whereby the teacher's role is just to facilitate the learning process and they give freedom to the learners to draw their conclusions through the questioning and answering process (Narejo, 2015).

Social-reconstructionism: 

It is the philosophy in which students are used as tools to overcome some of the social problems. Since the school prepares the future leaders and citizens of the country, each student should be well educated about life, not simply to achieve good marks in their academics, but also to be a good human being so that they value cultural differences, religious differences, poverty, respect for others, etc. (Lynch, 2016). Such a classroom prepares students with good moral values through the lessons and makes students understand the values of life through discussions on the subject and analysis. Moreover, students are also engaged in improving in public speaking, leadership, building core skills, etc.

Reasons why this philosophy correctly speaks to me

The reasons why the above philosophies correctly speak to me is because I follow the similar processes described above in my teaching and I find it more professional and practical than the lecture method. Quite often, the lecture method bore the students, but the student-centered philosophy enables the class to be active and engaging class.

Most importantly, I saw the gap between me and my students narrowing and students becoming closer to me. Studying through cooperative activities I found that students were able to acquire hands-on experience along with the content and were able to do text-to-real-life connections more confidently than before with improved elaborations. They are even able to realize and draw conclusions confidently whenever we discuss the problems in society.

Through the activities, they are engaged to explore their ideas in a wider sense and finally discover new knowledge based on the observations made and experiences gained” (Smerdon and Burkam, 1999). Moreover, this philosophy enabled me to involve a cent percent of students during the learning process and no students being left out. They can understand more from what they are doing. Students in their reading and writing portfolios are found more creative and critical than before maintaining the standardized write-ups. I am able to track their progress through continuous assessments and feedback. On the other hand, I observed that students gain confidence in public speaking and become responsible.

My classes are mostly interactive whereby I act as a facilitator, facilitating the class during the learning process. I engage my learners more in inquiry learning, cooperative learning, learning through research, drawing conclusions, role play, project writing, portfolio maintaining, reading logs, etc. focusing purely on the wholesome development of a child. However, after going through the educational philosophies, I felt that I needed to do more than what I had been doing with the clear objectives in mind.

Conclusion

The only best philosophy that can mend the students is the student-centered philosophy. Having an outstanding teaching philosophy means having a clear map to go ahead while teaching. But, teaching depends on the teacher’s teaching philosophies. The more he is comfortable with the topic he is going to teach, the better would be his strategies in the classroom. It is the teacher who builds students to be independent thinkers and decision-makers in the future. Thus, our main focus on the learners is to be prioritized and should not be compromised with any other factors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference:

Dewey. J. (1897). My Pedagogic Creed. Retrieved July 7, 2021 from http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm

UCD Dublin (n.d.). Education Theory. Retrieved July 7, 2021 from http://www.ucdoer.ie/index.php/Education_Theory

Brown, J. K. (2008). Student-Centered Instruction: Involving Students in Their Own Education. Retrieved July 8, 2021 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20685476

Sadker, D. & Zittleman K. (2007). Teachers School and Society: A Brief Introduction to Education. 207-217. Retrieved Retrieved July 8, 2021 from http://education.com/reference/article/Ref_Teacher_Centered

The Digi Teachers. (n.d.). Understanding the Different Types of Teaching Philosophies. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://thedigiteachers.com/teaching-philosophies/

Presbitero, J. ( n.d.). Educational Philosophies Definitions and Comparison Chart. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://www.academia.edu/6866854/Educational_Philosophies _Definitions_and_Comparison_Chart

Lynch. M. (2016). Philosophies of Education: 3 Types of Student-Centered Philosophies. Retrieved July 3, 2021 https://www.theedadvocate.org/philosophies-education-3-types-student-centered-philosophies/

Smerdon, B.A. & Burkam, D.T. (1999). Access to Constructivist and Didactic Teaching: Who Gets It? Where Is It Practiced? Retrieved July 8, 2021 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ598238

 

 

 

 

My Philosophical Stance and The Context in Which I Teach, and My Global Perspectives on The Purpose Of Education

 

My Philosophical Stance and The Context in Which I Teach, and My Global Perspectives on The Purpose Of Education

Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teacher, Damphu CS, Tsirang, Bhutan

 

Abstract

Schooling in Bhutan aims to revamp both content and pedagogical needs letting every learner meet the challenging demands of the world today. Moreover, it targets every individual learner on the acquisition of the competencies to the core STEM subjects with the aim that providing opportunities to gain values, ethics, and higher cognitive skills such as evaluating, analyzing, and synthesizing (Royal Education Council, 2021). To fulfill it, questions like “What makes a good teacher?” and “What is my understanding of teaching and education?” should be always pondered by a teacher. The situation in the classes may not be always the same, it varies due to students coming from multiple backgrounds. It depends on the teacher how he applies his philosophies in the classroom to have better outcomes for the students and to let them meet the challenges of the world through teaching (Lumen, n.d.). A teacher’s philosophy should bring impact on his learners for quality learning to take place so that opportunities open for the learners.

My Philosophical Stance and the Context in which I Teach

Teaching according to me is something that lets the learners transform the way they think about themselves and the world. I believe that it provides learners with various skills that shape their mindset so that the way they view things becomes real in life. It should provide learners with hands-on experience whereby they are learning by doing, experiencing, researching, inquiring, interacting, etc. so that they make meaning out of what knowledge they acquire. My beliefs and values on teaching are clear, but we can also see that most teachers often get confused with the type of beliefs they have with the type of ideas of teaching (Thelma, 200). This paper elaborates my philosophical Stance with the context in which I teach.

Many take learning as achieving in academics with a good percentage, but I think that learning is something that enables an individual to acquire knowledge and skills not only through studying but also through real-life experience. A good teacher always knows and understands his students based on how they develop and learn (Licklider, 2008). Students always make learning by comparing their past and prior processes of learning. To make the learning more successful a teacher should understand the learner’s area of interest, their previous knowledge, and their ability to grasp the meaning of the concept they are learning through proper planning. Moreover, cooperative learning and peer learning are some of the strategies that usually create learning by doing scenarios. I, during my lesson mostly engage my students in group activities, interactions, cooperative learning, presentations, and role-plays to make my teaching effective and to allow them to think themselves and grow. But, things sometimes don’t go well because of the variation of thoughts or interests of a few students. Sometimes students hardly participate because Bhutanese students are mostly shy, but I try my best to encourage them by changing the strategies and approaches and finally make them participate after which I provide them with positive feedback so that they turn up for the activity the next time.

On the other hand, teaching in the classroom is a major role that a teacher should take into consideration. Teaching simply doesn’t mean that we deliver the topic and complete the syllabus on time. To me, teaching should promote lifelong learning that transforms students with mastery and competency. It should promote critical and creative thinking. According to Ben Johnson, he stated that quality learning depends on how a teacher makes his students do things, and for active teaching to take place active learning should be encouraged in the classroom (Johnson, 2015). I believe that perfect teaching takes place if a teacher acts as a facilitator in the classroom and makes students do things. It is because they get hands-on experience through learning by doing and learning by creating. Moreover, a teacher should go to the class with fully planned lesson plans with identified teaching-learning materials and assignment plans. Since all teachers in my country are trained in the 21st Century Transformational Pedagogy (Kagan Structure), I practice the strategies discussed above. But during some cases, things don’t go well due to the availability of materials or meeting with the readiness of the students. But, mostly, I try to change my strategies that help them learn with greater impact. I try to improvise the teaching strategies and materials sometimes and make them available in the classroom. Sometimes, I invite my peer teacher and conduct peer teaching for greater impact in the classroom.

Timely feedbacks play a vital role in the effective learning process (Johnson, 2015). I strongly believe that students are provided with timely feedback at the right time and it should be delayed. Quite often I provide feedback to the students and mostly on-the-spot feedback because it allows students to be updated. Sometimes I arrange teacher-student conferences for feedback sessions if intensive care is to be given to a particular student. Such things will enable students to meet their learning needs. Aside from that, timely notebook corrections are carried out with the correction of portfolios maintained by students. I believe that face-to-face correction is more effective than correcting student’s notes independently. Therefore, I correct students’ notebooks in front of them and provide immediate feedback along with continuous assessment records so that next time, the issues can be addressed and student’s performance can be kept on track for further assistance.

Finally, simply teaching from the designated textbook alone cannot help students to excel during the learning process. My conscience says that they should be taught out of the box, away from the actual curriculum content for more exploration and effective learning. Ben Johnson stated, “Information on-demand is more valuable than information just in case" (Johnson, 2015) which I truly accept. Students are to be engaged in research learning, learning through inquiry, project writing, etc. which are integral to the learning process. I engage my students most of the time in research learning after which we are engaged in critically analyzing the contents making connections to real-life situations and deriving values for them.

What I learned from Global Perspectives on the Purpose of Education 

After going through the purposes of education of India, Brazil, China, Iran, Japan, Philippines, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Singapore, UK, and America and carefully analyzing it, I realize that the purpose of education is not simply about teaching the students in the classroom, but it is something that opens a global dimension and a holistic perspective in education that ultimately promote lifelong learning through the acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitude, and values from varied contents to face the challenges they confront (Silva, 2010). At times, my teaching methods contradicted the global concern about education now I realize that I should not simply focus on the academic achievements alone, spoon-feeding students on the contents and the one-way teaching, but I should be someone special in the classroom, a role model of inspiration and change for the wholesome development of every child. I realized that my mindset should be focused on the creation of complete human beings through the reconstruction of experiences and continued education for capacity building and mindful growth (Dewey, 1916/1980). Students should be made to understand the subject not really the content.

The concept, ‘education as the stepping stone for the preparation of life,’ which I had, is now nullified after Dewey clarified by saying that ‘education itself is life.’ It should be something that prepares students in cooperative living to exist in society meaningfully and should be the reconstruction of experience already gained for the promotion of socialized values (Shawal, n.d.). I realized that one needs to reflect once he is back home from school with questions such as,

·       In what ways did my lesson transform my students?

·       Did I make meaning out of my lesson today to change them intellectually or I just completed my intended topic?

·       Was I at par with the purpose of education through my lesson today or did I simply teach them to pass the examination?

·       Are my student’s critical thinking skills excelling through my teaching in preparing them for immediate life through self-realization?

·       Is my teaching aligned to meet the social needs of my students to make them socially efficient and culturally sound to address the social tenor of society?

 

Thus, teaching in the classroom should focus on improving teaching and studying culture not simply to achieve grades but to excel in knowledge and individual traits to be equipped, knowledgeable, expert, critically skilled, and sound citizens.

 

Reference:

Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education: An introduction to philosophy of education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works: 1899–1924, volume 9, 1916 (pp. 1–370). Carbondale/Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press

Johnson. B. (2015). What Is Your Educational Philosophy? Retrieved June 29, 2021 from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/what-your-educational-philosophy-ben-johnson

Lumen. (n.d.). Child development. Retrieved June 29, 2021 from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-hostos-child-development-education/chapter/what-are-education-philosophies/

Royal Education Council. (2021). English Curriculum Framework. Retrieved June 29, 2021 from https://rec.gov.bt/instruction-guides/#2663-2695-wpfd-class-xii-1616565621

Royal Education Council. (2021). Instructional Guide for English. Retrieved June 29, 2021 from https://rec.gov.bt/instruction-guides/#2663-2695-wpfd-class-xii-1616565621

Roberson, T. (2000). Philosophy of Philosophy: Making the Connection between Philosophy and Pedagogy for Preservice Teachers. Retrieved June 29, 2021 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED446092

Silva. M. C. D. (2010). Global Education Guidelines. Retrieved June 30, 2021 from https://www.developmenteducation.ie/media/documents/GEguidelines-web.pdf

Shawal. M. (n.d.). 4 Main Aims of Education as Advocated by John Dewey. Retrieved June, 19, 2021, https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/education/4-main-aims-of-education-as-advocated-by-john-dewey/69151

 

 

 

Educational Philosophies on Educational Goals, Teaching Methods, and Curricula and My Reflection

  Educational Philosophies on Educational Goals, Teaching Methods, and Curricula and My Reflection Author: Santosh Kumar Biswa, Sr. Teac...